Miss State
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,048  Stephen Jones FR 33:48
1,548  Eryk Yunk FR 34:29
1,549  Aaron Phelps JR 34:29
1,621  Tristan Orman SO 34:35
1,694  Quintin Reiser SO 34:41
1,799  JT Mackay SO 34:49
1,811  Curtis Kelly SR 34:50
1,885  Caden Foos SO 34:57
2,147  Pierce Rose SO 35:27
2,150  Zach Weaver SO 35:27
2,191  Blake Beavers FR 35:32
National Rank #209 of 312
South Region Rank #21 of 40
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 22nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 51.1%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Stephen Jones Eryk Yunk Aaron Phelps Tristan Orman Quintin Reiser JT Mackay Curtis Kelly Caden Foos Pierce Rose Zach Weaver Blake Beavers
Commadore Classic 09/17 1198 33:45 34:08 35:16 34:42 33:33 35:39 34:27 36:25 35:25
Roy Griak Invitational 09/24 1245 33:53 35:11 34:12 35:15 34:53 35:05 35:06 35:32 36:08
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/14 1239 33:48 34:38 34:35 35:34 34:47 35:09 35:21 35:24 35:24 35:20
South Region Championships 11/11 1204 33:47 34:12 34:06 34:18 34:53 34:37 35:19





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 19.9 550 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.8 2.5 4.5 6.3 9.6 12.3 14.3 20.5 27.4 0.8 0.3 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Stephen Jones 75.2
Eryk Yunk 115.0
Aaron Phelps 115.6
Tristan Orman 120.5
Quintin Reiser 127.4
JT Mackay 135.2
Curtis Kelly 135.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 0.1% 0.1 11
12 0.3% 0.3 12
13 0.6% 0.6 13
14 0.8% 0.8 14
15 2.5% 2.5 15
16 4.5% 4.5 16
17 6.3% 6.3 17
18 9.6% 9.6 18
19 12.3% 12.3 19
20 14.3% 14.3 20
21 20.5% 20.5 21
22 27.4% 27.4 22
23 0.8% 0.8 23
24 0.3% 0.3 24
25 0.1% 0.1 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0